|
|
Learn More About PRI |
|
|
|
Short-Circuited
By: Kelly Gorton
4.20.2011
If you had the chance to listen to Lance Izumi on the Ron Williams Show (WCIT-940am), here are more details on his recent book, Short-Circuited, mentioned on the program.
Read more
|
|
|
Colorado Republicans for Obamacare?
By: John R. Graham
4.14.2011
Colorado’s Health Benefits Exchange legislation, which would implement Obamacare in the state, was “mortally wounded,” but is being brought back to life by none other than the Republican majority leader in the state house of representatives, Amy Stephens, according to the Denver Post’s Tim Hoover.
Exchanges are the vehicles through which the gusher of cash from Obamacare’s tax hikes will be laundered into subsidies to favored health plans, payments to vendors and consultants, and salaried jobs for political appointees.
To be sure, this is not what the conservative Stephens thought she was doing.
Read more
|
|
|
Whatever Happened to California's Obamacare Exchange?
By: John R. Graham
4.8.2011
The single dumbest reason for a state legislating its own state-based Obamacare exchange is the excuse that "if we don't do it the federal government will do it for us." There is no evidence that this will happen. The Obamacrats can't even get an exchange up and running in a friendly state.
Read more
|
|
|
Romneycare's Popularity Plummets
By: John R. Graham
4.7.2011
Grace-Marie Turner speaks for many in expressing frustration with Mitt Romney’s inability to let go of his failed Massachusetts health-care “reform.” President Obama himself has frequently asserted that Obamacare is partly based on the so-called conservative ideas encompassed in Romneycare. New polling results from the Bay State might make the president rethink this approach, and give Romney more confidence to admit his error.
Read more
|
|
|
Clarifying Ryan's Medicare Reform
By: John R. Graham
4.7.2011
As yesterday’s uncritical cheerleading of Paul Ryan’s budget proposal dies down, one of his loudest fans has taken a closer look. Yesterday’s Wall Street Journal editorial asserted (incorrectly) that Ryan’s proposal “means that at age 65 you would be able to keep your same insurer, with the feds paying for that insurance instead of your employer.”
As I’ve already noted, that was a feature of last year’s Roadmap, not this week’s proposed budget. The Wall Street Journal corrected the record in today’s editorial, which clarifies that “the subsidies will flow through Medicare, only to regulated insurers and government-approved plans. It does not go as far as Mr. Ryan’s previous ‘roadmap’ which offered direct cash vouchers for individuals who preferred to buy insurance themselves.”
Read more
|
|
|
Ryan Flinched on Medicare
By: John R. Graham
4.6.2011
Path to Prosperity, Paul Ryan’s budget proposal, beats a significant retreat from last year’s Roadmap for America’s Future. The Roadmap contained a very precise “payment” (in Ryan’s words) of $11,000 — to be adjusted for future inflation by a factor combining changes in the Consumer Price Index and changes in medical prices — for future Medicare beneficiaries who are now under 55 years of age. Furthermore, you could have taken the “payment” and used it to “to pay for one of the Medicare certified plans, or any other plan, such as those offered by former employers or available from the private market” (p. 51).
Read more
|
|
|
|
 |