Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Hold on to Your Hats: A Good Health Bill Might Actually Pass in California


By: John R. Graham
6.11.2008

SB 1096 would improve patient adherence to medication

 

New bills in the New York legislature are designed to prevent inducements to switch prescriptions.  But what about a bill to improve patients' likelihood of sticking with the therapy they were first prescribed?

According to a recent literature review in the Archives of Internal Medicine, 20% to 50% of chronically ill patients do not adhere to their prescribed medical therapy.  You would think that the government would want to get out of the way of anything that might improve that.

So, California state senator Ron Calderon (D-Montebello) has introduced a bill, SB 1096, that would allow pharmacies to use third parties (bulk mailers) to mail information to patients that would remind them to take their medications appropriately.  To allay privacy worries, the information would go no farther than that.

Sounds like a no-brainer, right? Wrong: David Lazarus of the Los Angeles Times reports concerns that the real pushers of this bill are brand-name drugmakers, who would actually pay the pharmacies to do this.  Why? According to Mr. Lazarus, this would short-circuit competing drugmakers' attempts to switch patients to their medicines.

So, if you are an innovative drugmaker or pharmacy benefits manager (PBM), you are increasingly out of luck.  The states don't want you to induce patients to switch from a competing medicine, but they also don't want you to induce patients to stick with your medicine.  I guess patients and doctors are just supposed to face "inducements" from the state itself!

But generic drugmakers and pharmacies are having a grand old time with consumer-driven health care: Safeway just announced it's following its rivals' offers of $4 prescriptions for 30-day supplies of generic meds.  Brand-name drugmakers cannot compete on price like this.  They have invested billions in inventing their medicines, and they can only compete on information.

SB 1096 will improve patient communications, adherence to therapy, and maybe even reduce health costs.  I can't believe it's about to happen, but the California legislature might actually pass one good piece of health care legislation this year!




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources