Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care Technology
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Journalism, Citizen Politics and the Truth in the Era of Change
9.22.2010 12:00:00 PM
MICHAEL P. RAMIREZ
Senior Editor/Editorial Cartoonist, ... 
More

The Future of Traditional Media in the Information Age
9.28.2010 12:00:00 PM

John P. Wilcox
Publisher, The San Francisco Examiner 
More

The Battle: How the Fight between Free Enterprise and Big Government Will Shape America's Future
10.25.2010 12:00:00 PM

with ARTHUR C. BROOKS
President, American Enterprise ... 
More

Recent Events
The Canadian Century: moving out of america’s shadow
6.24.2010 5:45:00 PM
Elephant & Castle Pub and Restaurant, 424 Clay Street, San ... More

Marin Town Hall "Health Care"
6.22.2010 7:00:00 AM
A Marin Town ... More

The Fall of the House of Kennedy
6.17.2010 6:30:00 PM

Keynote Speaker Daniel Henninger, Pulitzer Prize-winning author ... More

Featured Scholar
Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Environmentalists on a Diet


By: Sebastian Wisniewski
10.24.2007

Studies suggest that changing your diet may significantly help the environment. Vegetarians and especially vegans boast lower 'greenhouse-gas' emissions. Not per car, or house, or factory, but per person.

 

A 2005 University of Chicago study shows that a standard vegetarian diet produces about 1.5 fewer metric tons of carbon dioxide per year. The impact is similar to that associated with switching from a Chevy Suburban to a Toyota Camry. Eliminating eggs and milk from our diets makes an even bigger difference.


The main problem is methane - one of the side products of digesting. And humans aren't the only smelly contributors to climate change. Cows are responsible for roughly triple the methane emissions of the American coal industry.


Land area and quality also have to be taken into account. As Cornell University scientists quoted in Slate (Vegans vs. Vegetarians, Oct. 23, 2007) point out, sometimes it is better to endure a modest carnivore, because cattle can graze on inferior land not suitable for crops. Obtaining more calories out of the land "means that less food needs be imported from elsewhere, thereby reducing the burning of fossil fuels".


What scientists and extreme environmentalists forgot to add is that breathing can be a problem as well. Every single day humans, not to mention other animal species inhabiting planet Earth, consume precious oxygen and produce lots of carbon dioxide. Therefore, apart from becoming either vegan or vegetarian, it may also be 'wise' to begin limiting our breathing.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources