Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print What's Behind Anthem's Huge California Rate Hikes?


By: John R. Graham
2.8.2010

Californians with individually purchased health insurance were rocked last week by news that Anthem Blue Cross was planning to raise rates for some individual policies by 39 percent. U.S. Secretary of Health & Human Services Kathleen Sebelius has got into the act, demanding an explanation (even though she has no authority over rates in California’s individual market).

 

Anthem Blue Cross claims that rising medical costs are the culprit, but there’s no way that underlying medical costs are going up at that rate. California’s individual market must be suffering from adverse selection.

What’s causing it? My speculation is that California’s new regulations on rescission are one cause of the spiral. I’ve written a long thread on the topic. Previously, an applicant for individual coverage could lose her policy if she had not told the truth about her health status on her application. California changed the rules to require the carrier to prove willful misrepresentation by the applicant – even with objective evidence that she had neglected to fully inform the carrier of a condition. If an applicant “forgets” or doesn’t “understand” what her health condition is, the carrier will not be able to rescind a policy that was written with incomplete information.

I’ve heard from insurance agents that policies with maternity benefits are suffering the biggest increases. That’s a pretty strong signal of a selection problem. I wish Anthem Blue Cross would give us the full story.


This blog post originally appeared on StateHouseCall.org.

 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources