Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print It’s Summit Day in Washington


By: Jeffrey H. Anderson, Ph.D
2.25.2010

A year into the health-care debate, President Obama will be hosting a health-care summit today at the Blair House — something it is humanly impossible to imagine a president with a keener sense of the stature of his office doing. When you watch, imagine the Blair House as President Obama will likely see it in his mind's eye, with a large “Health-Care Reform: Grand Reopening” banner draped across its entrance, bands playing, and children laughing.

 

Of course, there will be no grand reopening, no joyful children, and no bands, just the same old Obamacare — which is not something Americans would get to choose whether to buy so much as it would be forced down their throats by any means possible, including via “budget reconciliation” if necessary.

At the summit, we'll hear a lot of talk about insurers’ allegedly extravagant profits, which, in reality, are only 2.2 percent. What we won't hear is how the Democrats’ proposed health-care overhaul would funnel $1 trillion in its real first dozen years (2014 to 2025) from American taxpayers, through the federal government, to those same insurers — while requiring Americans to buy insurers’ product. (There’s a reason why insurers have been supporting Obamacare.)

We’ll hear a lot about the need to lower health costs, lower deficits, and put Medicare on more solid financial footing — even though the Democrats’ proposed overhaul would raise health costs, raise deficits, and further exacerbate our daunting entitlement challenges by siphoning hundreds of billions of dollars out of Medicare and spending it on Obamacare.

We’ll hear a lot about how the Republicans don’t have ideas — even though the major Republican health-care proposals would all lower health costs and insurance premiums, while increasing the number of Americans with insurance far more efficiently and affordably (at a cost of about $20,000 per newly insured person under the House GOP health bill, versus $76,000 under Obamacare) than the Democrats’ proposed overhaul would.

After cutting through all the bluster, all you really need to know is this: Obamacare would cost $2.5 trillion, reduce Americans’ freedom, and still manage to increase nationwide health-care costs. That’s why 73 percent of Americans want Congress to scrap it, and why the bands will be playing only in President Obama’s imagination.


02/25 12:00 AM

This blog post originally appeared on National Review's Critical Condition.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources