Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Shocked, Shocked: AHIP Caves


By: Benjamin Zycher, Ph.D
3.31.2010

The insurance industry announced today that it would not dispute the Obama administration interpretation of the requirement for insurance "coverage" (subsidies) of children with pre-existing medical conditions. And why should they? The new law transforms the insurers into public utilities, and premiums will have to cover costs plus a fair and reasonable return.

 

Benjamin Zycher

Even if the bureaucrats and politicians have incentives to ignore the latter, benefits will have to be paid, and so premiums will have to be sufficient to cover them. So, unlike the case in a normal insurance market, the brave new world created by Obamacare introduces powerful disincentives to scrutinize claims or to avoid cross-subsidies among patient groups. The upshot will be skyrocketing premiums driven by massive adverse selection, combined with strong incentives for individuals to evade the mandate to buy insurance, and powerful political disincentives to enforce the mandate. So much yet again for the promises that premiums will fall, businesses will see lower costs, insureds' favored coverage policies will remain available, ad infinitum. I am starting to wonder if the constant revelation of surprises lurking in the legislation — the accounting losses reported last week by various firms are only an example — will lead over time to ever-greater cynicism about the bill and about those who voted for it.


Benjamin Zycher is a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute.


03/31 06:22 PM

This blog post originally appeared on National Review's Critical Condition.

 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources