Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Despite Budget Resolution, Medi-Cal Crisis Endures


By: John R. Graham
9.24.2008 4:28:00 PM

Providers and Patients Suffer As Politicians Dodge Reform

 

Three months late, governor Schwarzenegger has finally signed a budget.  Unfortunately, the governor and legislators missed the chance to wrangle Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program, under control.

The budget agreement held the line pretty well on this gargantuan program for the short term appropriating 14.5 billion for 2008-2009 versus $14.2 billion last year.  But that’s not the whole story: total Medi-Cal spending will be more than twice as much, $39.4 billion, because the federal government pays the state for most of it.

But Medi-Cal’s long-term spending trend is still out of control: Between 1997-1998 and 2006-2007, MediCal spending increased at an annual rate of 7 percent, nearly doubling.  And fully one third of this increase was due to increased enrollment.  Because of the federal matching payments, California has an incentive to enroll more and more people into government dependency for their health care.

But Medi-Cal does no favors for providers: In 2003, Medi-Cal paid physicians only 59 percent of what Medicare (itself a poor payer) paid, on average.  And the situation got worse when California started drifting into this year’s budget crisis.  During the special session last February, the governor signed a bill rolling back Medi-Cal providers’ fees by 10 percent, starting July 1.  Doctors and pharmacists argued that the roll-back violated federal Medicaid law, and a federal judge agreed.  So, the state has partially restored the cuts imposed last summer, but continues its appeal.

The governor and legislature must be pretty confident they will prevail: The budget extends the 10 percent payment cut until March 1, 2009, after which providers will get some relief.

Or maybe not: even if the federal court decision stands, and blows up the roll-back, the state couldn’t pay providers what the judge demands anyway.   In fact, the “annual” budget doesn’t really even cover the whole fiscal year.  There will have to be a special election (likely next March or June) to authorize borrowing $5 billion against future lottery receipts.

So, despite years of out-of-control spending, Medi-Cal still fails both providers and patients.  At its core, the problem is not a budgetary crisis: it’s a crisis of government dependency.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources