Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Doctors Seven Times More Satisfied with Payments from Private Insurance as Medicare


By: John R. Graham
9.18.2009

With all the polls of Americans on health reform, one group’s members are rarely surveyed about their preferences: physicians. Although medical societies are lobbying for special privileges, the views of actual physicians have remained largely unexamined. Two physicians recently sought to remedy this by surveying a random sample of 6,000 physicians (of which 43% responded) and publishing the results in the New England Journal of Medicine.

 

Funded by the Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Foundation, the survey’s results were promoted with a different headline than you see above.

Poll finds most doctors support public option,” said National Public Radio (NPR); “73% of doctors favor public option,” said Salon’s Steve Klingman. These headlines were encouraged by the RWJ Foundation’s press release. Actually, 63% of physicians who responded supported “public and private options,” only 10% supported “public options only,” and 27% supported “private options only,” so the respondents’ preference is clearly for private options.

Of course, answers to surveys are significantly impacted by the phrasing of the questions, as well as their order. Let’s take two extreme examples. Consider these two-question surveys:

Survey 1:

  1. The Congressional Budget Office has announced that the federal budget deficit will be over $9 trillion over the next ten years. How concerned are you about the fiscal future of the country?
  2. The President has proposed a new “public option” for health insurance, which will raise taxes and government spending to fund new federal bureaucracies that will control Americans’ access to medical services. Would you be in favor of, or opposed to, such a program?

Survey 2:

  1. The U.S. Census Bureau has announced that over 46 million people in the United States have no health insurance. How concerned are you about the uninsured in this country?
  2. The President has proposed a new “public option” for health insurance, which will make significant progress towards the goal of insuring every American. Would you be in favor of, or opposed to, such a program?

Obviously, the responses would be very different. Given the bias of the RWJ Foundation, my prejudice is that the survey looked a lot more like the 2nd version, above. However, in a courteous exchange of e-mails, the authors told me that they have further research to do on the results of the survey, and have decided not to make the survey itself public until an unspecified future date.

So, we shall wait and see.  Nevertheless, given physicians’ currently negative experience with Medicare, it would be remarkable if the majority really preferred more Americans to be enrolled in a similar program.


 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources