Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel 
More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society 
More

Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Sally Pipes and Dennis Prager
5.2.2012 6:00:00 PM

Why the World Needs American Values

 More

Luncheon and Book Launch Featuring John Stossel
4.20.2012 12:00:00 PM
The City Club of San Francisco More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Government Monopoly Health Care in Quebec


By: John R. Graham
12.10.2008 5:10:00 PM

State Has "Universal" Coverage, But Families Don't Have Doctors

 

Proud Canadian that I am, I like to keep my ears and eyes on my homeland.  A couple of days ago, the province of Quebec had a general election.  As always, in states where the government monopolizes "universal" health care, the permanent health crisis is a major political issue.

You may recall that Quebec's interference with the private practice of medicine, outlawing Dr. Jacques Chaoulli from operating on patient George Zeliotis, resulted in a Supreme Court of Canada judgment that the government's monopoly of health care violated its citizens' civil rights.

The Parti Quebecois, which came in 2nd place, was running this ad during the election.

The speakers are candidates, not actors.  For those who don't speak French, the translation goes like this:

1st woman: "Everybody talks about health.  Everybody talks about hospitals."

1st man: "And everybody talks about money. Our health-care calculation led us to the following conclusion..."

2nd woman: "What's necessary, is that everyone has access to a family doctor."

2nd man: "It's not complicated, and above all, its not difficult to understand."

3rd man: "Every Quebecker must have a family doctor."

4th man: "It's just as simple as that."

3rd woman (party leader Pauline Marois): "The Marois plan really makes sense, in accord with Quebec's needs. It's our plan - for a winning Quebec."

So, there you have it: In the U.S., politicians promise "universal" health care.  In a jurisdiction with "universal" health care, the politicians can't handle talking about hospitals or money, so they focus on the apparently simple goal of a general practitioner for every family - which they haven't achieved after four decades of government monopoly.

Home, sweet home!




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources