Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel 
More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society 
More

Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Sally Pipes and Dennis Prager
5.2.2012 6:00:00 PM

Why the World Needs American Values

 More

Luncheon and Book Launch Featuring John Stossel
4.20.2012 12:00:00 PM
The City Club of San Francisco More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Government Planning Makes Long-Term Planning Impossible


By: John R. Graham
1.21.2009 12:30:00 PM

Despite "universal" health care, Mass. spending out of control

 

I envy the good people of Massachusetts at least one thing: (in my humble opinion) the Boston Globe has the best coverage of local health policy.  (Pity me, I'm stuck with the Los Angeles Times, and its kin.)

Prompted by the BoGlo's coverage of out-of-control health-care spending in the wake of the Bay State's April 2006 law mandating so-called "universal" health care, governor Deval Patrick has threatened the health-care industry (both insurers and providers) with price controls.

His administration has asked health-care bosses, especially Partners HealthCare (which owns most of Boston's hospital-capacity) and the state's largest insurer, Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mass., "to refrain from signing new contracts that cover patient care beyond this year, until the government has time to consider potential reform measures."

It's remarkable because these two elephants signed a multi-year contract last year that covers annual cost-increases of 5% to 6%.  So, the governor is demanding that the state's largest hospital system and largest health insurer stop long-term planning until the state's government gets its act together on health "reform".  (It's hard to remember that it was supposed to have been "reformed" less than three years ago!)

While the BoGlo's investigative reporters have determined that hospitals in Boston have cost-variances of 30%, with no difference in quality, the governor is trying to put the brakes on private initiatives to respond to this information.

Fortunately, it looks like these initatives continue, despite the governor's flailing.  Blue Cross & Blue Shield just signed a contract with Tufts Medical Center that includes a type of pay-for-performance that they call an "alternative quality contract."

It must be incredibly difficult for payers and providers to negotiate such a contract, in the face of Massachusetts' spiralling health-care costs, which are driven by "universal" health care.  Governor Patrick would serve the public interest by keeping his nose out of it.  Massachusetts politicians have done enough already, to mess up health care in the Bay State.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources