Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Make September the New August: Tips for Rep. Wilson & Other Obama Critics


By: John R. Graham
9.10.2009

Like Jay Nordlinger, I "read" the president's speech on a muted TV (at a bar in Sausalito, where the bartender wasn't too happy about switching over from the US Open on ESPN2). And I only did that because I got a last minute call from the Australian Broadcasting Corporation inviting me to join a panel discussion on their national radio broadcast about 45 minutes after the speech finished. I had hoped to be able to watch the tennis and read the speech later, on my computer at home.

 

So, I also had a different experience than those who heard the Republicans grumbling, and Congressman Wilson call out, "You lie." It looks like the consensus over on The Corner is that Mr. Wilson was way out of line. As Kathryn Jean Lopez points out, it's not the House of Commons. (If it were the House of Commons, the jab would have been much more subtle. In Westminster, Ottawa, or Canberra, the usual challenge to misrepresentation is simply: "shame, shame.")

Nevertheless, opponents of the federal take-over of Americans' access to medical services are concerned that the president's faction will seize the initiative again, simply because they are back on their turf: Washington, D.C.

Maybe folks like Representative Wilson long for the salad days of August, when you could "debate" health reform by simply by strapping a pistol to your hip, picking up a sign of the president wearing a swastika-armband, and strolling down to the high-school gym to shout at ACORN activists and union organizers.

Look, I wax as nostalgic for those town-hall days as much as anyone, having delivered a few bons mots from behind a microphone while tea-bags were waving around me.

But they don't have to die, just because we ripped a page off the calendar, or Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid called the inmates back to their cells.

My point here is that Mr. Wilson and his colleagues didn't have to sit there listening to the speech (which was an inappropriate use of presidential privilege; I think the president should really only make these speeches during times of national emergency, like war.). Mr. Wilson (and other legislators of similar disposition) would have served the public interest better by hosting a town hall back home instead, watching the speech on TV, and then moderating a discussion in response.

That's really the only way to preserve the summer's honest, open conversation about the consequences of this proposal. If we allow Congress and the White House to get back to "business as usual," the take-over will proceed.

— John R. Graham is director of Health Care Studies at the Pacific Research Institute.

 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources