Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Missouri Hospitals Are Not in Kansas Anymore, Toto


By: John R. Graham
10.2.2007

But Where in Oz Will the Tornado Drop Them?

 

(Spoiler alert: Wizard of Oz metaphor continues below.)

Truman Medical Centers, a health system (what we used to call "group of hospitals") in Kansas City, is about to start charging uninsured patients who live in KC and Jackson County upfront for non-emergency services. Well, it's about time, isn't it?

Every other enterprise in the U.S. has figured out that banks, not butchers or bakers or candlestick makers, have a comparative advantage in managing individuals' credit risks. So, they accept credit cards. Why are hospitals just now figuring this out?

Well, Truman Medical Centers didn't used to have to worry about it: Missouri Medicaid subsidized uninsured treatment. When that funding shrank, in 2005, Truman started to demand payment from uninsured patients who lived outside KC and Jackson County, which continued to give Truman $36 million a year to cover uninsured patients.

But that's no longer enough: Truman claims uncompensated care now runs to $79 million a year. Now, I don't know anything about Truman Medical Centers other than what I read today, but I do know that hospitals creatively account for uncompenated care, by using list prices instead of actual transaction prices to add it up. But they also labor under crazy government (Medicare & Medicaid) pricing that make it difficult to do otherwise, (a challenge that some states have tried to address legislatively).

But why were taxpayers subsidizing the hospitals for non-emergency care until now? EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment & Active Labor Act) only requires stabilization in emergencies. This development indicates that subsidies were too great and might be coming back under control.

And what will the political repercussions be, when uninsured patients have to pay upfront? Missouri ranks 32nd in the U.S. Index of Health Ownership, and 24th in the "provider burden of regulation" category. Maybe Truman will do what hospitals often do: lobby for more handouts and protection (described in wonderfully appalling detail in Prof. Regina Herzlinger's recently published Who Killed Health Care?).

Or maybe Truman will embrace the change, welcome cash-paying patients, and actually seek to compete for them. Let's hope so: U.S. hospitals are very powerful politically, and the Yellow Brick Road to consumer-driven health care will be a lot easier for us to follow if they take the lead.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources