Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Pacific PolicyCast: Proposition 86: Keep Tobacco Money Out of Our Hospitals


By: Joshua S. Treviño
10.2.2006

Pacific Research Institute's Josh Treviño interviews PRI Health Care Director John R.Graham regarding California Proposition 86. Proposition 86 will put an additional tax on cigarette sales. California hospitals want a part of the New Tobacco Industry action.

 

California hospitals are seduced by the New Tobacco Industry. This industry makes nothing that it sells to those who voluntarily buy. Instead, it feeds off a river of cash, a Leviathan wreathed in smoke rising from the billions of dollars that the government extracts from the Old Tobacco Industry and its customers every year.

Housed in university faculties, private consulting practices, trial lawyers’ offices, advertising agencies, and departments of health, the New Tobacco Industry rides a nicotine-stained merry-go-round. The more tobacco
money it gets, the more it can afford to invest in new lobbying efforts for another round, despite questionable indications of its success at influencing smoking cessation. Indeed, the California Department of Health Services’ Tobacco Control Section (TCS), a body entirely dependent on confiscated tobacco funding, seeks a “tobacco-free California.” Obviously, expecting the number of smokers to fall to zero is absurd; stating it as an objective gives fair warning that the New Tobacco Industry will never be sated.

 

Download file PRI_Podcast_Prop_86


Read PRI Voter Pamphlet


 

Direct Download  
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources