Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Pacific PolicyCast: Righting Property Wrongs: Proposition 90 and California property rights


By: Joshua S. Treviño
10.2.2006

Pacific Research Institute's Josh Treviño interviews Steven Greenhut of the Orange County Register and author of the PRI pamphlet "Righting Property Wrongs: Proposition 90 and California property rights."

 

"Protect Our Homes Initiative," Proposition 90, would include significant restrictions on the ability of governments to use eminent domain for economic development purposes and to pass regulations that limit property rights.

Property rights in the United States were vastly eroded after the high court, in a 5-to-4 ruling, declared that local governments can take property from individual owners and give it to other private owners in the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 23, 2005 decision Kelo v. the City of New London (Connecticut). The justices ruled that it’s not the court’s job to “second-guess” cities, declaring that the Fifth Amendment’s requirement that takings be for a “public use” had long been a dead letter.

 

Read Pamphlet

 





 

Direct Download  
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources