Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Paving the Road with Moderation


By: Benjamin Zycher, Ph.D
9.15.2009

It is absolutely essential that no health-care legislation pass Congress this year, in that any "compromise" that actually could get enough Democratic votes would lead inexorably toward socialized medicine. (If someone else has made this rather obvious point, I apologize.) An individual mandate is deemed necessary because of the perverse incentives inherent in guaranteed issue/community rating "reforms." I am a bit surprised that the Left does not recognize — yet — that the individual mandate moves legislation away from their ultimate goal, the destruction of private insurance and the massive movement of the citizenry (and noncitizenry) into dependence upon the federal government.

 

Benjamin Zycher
Without the individual mandate, insurance "reform" — no constraints on coverage created by pre-existing medical conditions, and a necessary corollary, price controls in health coverage — would be hugely popular politically. But those two policies would yield a rapid destruction of the private insurance market (for nonemployer policies) because of a resulting massive adverse-selection problem. From the viewpoint of the Left, the only reason, it seems to me, to support the individual mandate is fiscal: An individual mandate forces the healthy to subsidize everyone else, thus moderating the explicit tax increases needed to pay for health-care socialism.

Accordingly: All this talk of finding some compromise to satisfy Republican/conservative objections is silly. Yes, the abortion funding issue is important, as is the noneligibility of noncitizens, etc. But the central, basic, fundamental problem looming huge for the future of American culture and economic vitality — the effort by the Left to find ways to destroy capitalism in the health-care sector and beyond — cannot be avoided through compromise on such secondary issues, however important taken in isolation. It must be made absolutely clear to the opposition on the Hill and in the nation at large: If Obama signs a bill this year, we will have lost, permanently.


Benjamin Zycher is a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute.


 

 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources