Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print President Bush's Health Reform Keeps Getting Better. Will the NY Times Ever Get It?


By: John R. Graham
6.28.2007 2:31:00 PM

Today, Secretary of Health & Human Services Leavitt and Director of National Economic Council Hubbard elaborated the President's proposal for a health coverage tax credit.  Meanwhile, the New York Times is stuck in a rut on health policy.

 

The Times yesterday published a poll "revealing" that 62% of young Americans favor "having one health insurance program covering all Americans that would be administered by the government and paid for by taxpayers."  But the Times only gave respondents one alternative: "keeping the current system where many people get their insurance from private employers and some have no insurance."

Some choice.  How about a 3rd: "Take your own money and spend it on the health plan that you want"?  That's what President Bush proposed last January.  Instead of receiving health care as a non-taxable corporate benefit, you'd get a raise alongside a deduction of $7,500 (single) and $15,000 (family) for health insurance.

It would be a big improvement but not rectify one flaw: in America's progressive tax system, the rich benefit more from the tax advantage (just like they do now).  So, the President's team now proposes the alternative of a tax credit: $2,500 (single) and $4,500 (family).

Suppose your combined marginal tax rate is 30%.  You'd be indifferent because the $15,000 deduction would save you $4,500 in taxes.  However, the higher earner, in a 40% tax bracket, would prefer the deduction because it would save him $6,000.  The lower earner, in a 20% tax bracket, would prefer a credit because the deduction only saves him $3,000 in taxes.

So, this new proposal should appeal to "Class Warrior" Dems in Congress, who currently occupy themselves throwing more money at a bill to re-authorize State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) funding.  President Bush and Secretary Leavitt are resisting this spending spree.  (They could be even tougher on SCHIP than they are: it's a program that ropes lots of our kids into government dependency and distorts private insurance markets.)

Nevertheless, if President Bush and Secretary Leavitt can get this tax credit in exchange for re-authorizing SCHIP they will have done Americans a great service: freeing every family to choose its own health plan.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources