Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Rhode Island's Medicaid Waiver Promises Positive Reform


By: John R. Graham
9.15.2008 3:10:00 PM

Limiting Taxpayer Liability While Increasing Choice: What's Not To Like?

 

Last month, I made encouraging remarks to the Heartland Institute's outstanding monthly Health Care News about Rhode Island governor Carcieri's evolving proposal to reform Medicaid.

Well, the proposal is fully formed, and the state has just submitted its application for a waiver to the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.  The New York Times does not like it, because it changes "much of its Medicaid program from an open-ended entitlement with no limit on spending to a capped budget with fixed expenditure limits."

Well, just because the NY Times criticises it doesn't automatically make it a good idea, but could you imagine even this bastion of the liberal establishment using that kind of language about any other government program? Imagine anxiety over:

  • changing welfare from an open-ended entitlement with no limit on spending to a capped budget with fixed expenditure limits;
  • changing the military from an open-ended entitlement with no limit on spending to a capped budget with fixed expenditure limits; or
  • changing education from an open-ended entitlement with no limit on spending to a capped budge with fixed expenditure limits?

In fact, that's sort of what we expect from government programs, isn't it? That they at least pretend to adhere to a budget?

Governor Carcieri is a successful, retired businessman who decided to run for chief executive of his home state - his first real political office.  His Medicaid waiver is bold and realistic.  I'm sure that there's a devil in the details, but the key element is outstanding: accepting a hard cap on federal transfer payments for five years in return for state sovereignty over its Medicaid program.

It's a good start - but only a start.  Rhode Island ranks a lowly 48th out of 50 in the U.S. Index of Health Ownership - and it's not because of Medicaid, but a bad tort environment and over-regulation of private health insurance.

If governor Carcieri shows the same initiative and energy in reforming these parts of health care as he has in Medicaid, then Rhode Island has a healthy future.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources