Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print School-Based Health Centers: One Stop Shopping For Government Dependency


By: John R. Graham
10.9.2008

Should The Same People Who Run The K-12 School Monopoly Control Our Kids' Health Care?

 

California Governor Schwarzenegger recently signed a bill (SB 564) to fund school-based health centers that will provide primary and associated care to K-12 students.  According to the trade association (!) that lobbied for the bill, California currently has 153 school-based health centers, which appear to be mostly funded by local government.

SB 564 is their lobbyists' first success at winning direct funding from state government.  Well, sort of: the river of cash will still need an appropriations bill to start flowing, and that's questionable given the state's perpetual budget crisis.

This bill invites serious questioning from various angles.  First, if school-based health centers are effective, then the state should not be taxing people to fund them.  Instead, it should be up to local governments.

Second, if kids need primary care that they don't get from doctors, then the state should not be competing against convenient, retail clinics, that are springing up to serve communities' needs.

Third, if parents need financial assistance to get primary health care for their kids, then the state should fund the parents, not the providers, especially from distant Sacramento.

Fourth, California's K-12 school system can't even school the kids properly.  Almost one half of freshmen admitted to California State University campuses require remedial classes!

Come on!  I'm sure these lobbyists for the school-based health centers have our kids' best interests at heart, but if our schools can't even get education right, do they really expect us to believe that they can get our kids' health care right?




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources