Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel 
More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society 
More

Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Sally Pipes and Dennis Prager
5.2.2012 6:00:00 PM

Why the World Needs American Values

 More

Luncheon and Book Launch Featuring John Stossel
4.20.2012 12:00:00 PM
The City Club of San Francisco More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print Stockholm Syndrome in California's Business Community


By: John R. Graham
9.18.2007 6:13:00 PM

Another Employer Group Begs to Be Taxed

 

Although Governor Schwarzenegger's health reform plan has staggered along since January without enlisting any legislator to propose enabling legislation, and the Legislature recessed with the governor guaranteeing to veto the Democratic majority's alternative, a growing number of California's business interests have strangely decided that they need to fall on their swords in order to avoid having their throats cut by the Democrats in the special session this autumn.

The latest victim of this Stockholm Syndrome is the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, which now endorses Gov. Schwarzenegger's 4 percent payroll tax and joint employer/individual mandate.  The reason? This is better than the Democrats 7.5% payroll tax and employer-only mandate!  The LA Chamber joins the California Retail Association, the California Restaurant Association, and the Small Business for Affordable Healthcare self-styled advocacy group in caving in.

All these business groups appear to suffer from the delusion that there is a real difference between the government forcing employees or employers to spend money on what the state demands.  (Of course there's also the delusion of "shared responsibility" that requires the government to pay it's fair share too.  You know,....from that chest of gold buried under the Capitol.)

I suppose that these business groups believe that the mooted ballot initiatives on health reform, which will likely shape up to be two or three different flavors of tax increase to fund "universal" health care, will confuse the people so much that they will vote for the smallest tax increase, rather than send all the options to defeat.

C'mon fellahs, get some spine: Prop 86, the November 2006 tobacco tax iniative, was defeated despite being a million times easier to understand than these various health reform proposals.

The U.S. spends 40 percent more on health care than the next biggest spender, Switzerland.  California's business leaders need to learn that real health reform costs less dollars, not more.




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources