Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel 
More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society 
More

Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Sally Pipes and Dennis Prager
5.2.2012 6:00:00 PM

Why the World Needs American Values

 More

Luncheon and Book Launch Featuring John Stossel
4.20.2012 12:00:00 PM
The City Club of San Francisco More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Blog RSS Archive
E-mail Print The Death of Employer-Based Benefits Is Nigher Than I Thought


By: John R. Graham
10.9.2009

Yesterday, I pointed out that the "excise tax" for not maintaining (what we call today) continuous, creditable coverage would be much lower (maximum $1,900) than the annual premiums for a health-insurance policy. I concluded that Tower Perrins' September survey of employers, which reported that less than half of employers would continue to offer health benefits if the "pay or play" fine was lower than the cost of health benefits, informs us that we will experience a massive shedding of employer-based health benefits.

 

$1,900 came from the September 28 Wall Street Journal. However, the version of the Chairman's mark dated September 22 (but posted on October 2) at the Senate Finance Committee's website, reports a fine of $750 per adult as of 2017 (p. 35) - and confirms no jail-time for non-compliance with the mandate.

Obviously, this would accelerate the death spiral that I described previously, if the legislation substitutes this ineffective mandate for the current law's requirement that an individual maintain continuous, creditable coverage.

— John R. Graham is director of Health Care Studies at the Pacific Research Institute.

 




 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources