Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
There are no upcoming events at this time
Recent Events
Obama's Education Takeover
2.8.2012 6:00:00 PM

Lance T. Izumi, Koret Senior Fellow and PRI's Senior ... More

Health Care Reform: A Different Path - Current Federal Plan May Be Bad For Your Health
2.2.2012 11:30:00 AM
The Orange County Forum presents a luncheon and reception with ... More

Cocktail Reception—Celebrate the Book Release of The Pipes Plan: The Top Ten Ways to Dismantle and Replace ObamaCare
1.26.2012 5:30:00 PM

Celebrate the Release of Sally C. Pipes’ New Book ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Learn More About PRI RSS Archive
Twice as Much?
By: K. Lloyd Billingsley
4.27.2007

Bruce Blanning of Professional Engineers in California government says that contracting work to private companies "cost twice as much as having state employees do it," as he recently told the Sacramento Bee. Since this runs counter to the usual pattern, responses are welcome.


A recent California Supreme Court Ruling on Propositon 35 allows private companies to participate in state construction projects. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called the unanimous ruling a victory for taxpayers.

Read more
Response to Judge Richard Posner on "Jackpot Justice"
By: Hovannes Abramyan
4.23.2007

On April 1, Judge Richard Posner attempted to refute the findings of PRI's study Jackpot Justice: The True Cost of America's Tort System on the Becker-Posner Blog. [See: Is the Tort System Costing the United States $865 Billion a Year?--Posner, April 1, 2007.]

Judge Posner's comments, while a serious attempt to refute the study on the merits of the report, were riddled with errors ranging from misreadings, false accusations, inaccurate citations, to untrue claims.

What follows is our response to Judge Posner's comments in a point-by-point format. It reveals what we believe to be poor reading/comprehension of our report and a clear misrepresentation of our methodology. Despite the claim made by Judge Posner, our results are far from ficticious.


Read more
Browse by
Recent Publications
Blog Archive
Powered by eResources