Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Business & Economics PUBLICATIONS Archive
Impact - October 2006
Submitted on 10.31.2006

PRI Ideas in Action - October 2006
Policy Update and Monthly Impact Report

Proposition 89: No Clean Sweep
Submitted by K. Lloyd Billingsley on 10.10.2006

Proposition 89, the “California Clean Money and Fair Elections Act of 2006,” slated for the November 7 ballot, provides for public funding of political campaigns. Though participation is not mandatory, the measure limits the contribution amounts for privately funded candidates. Prop. 89 also imposes new contribution limits on ballot measures. The public funding is paid for by raising corporate taxes from 8.84 percent to 9.04 percent — a hike of 0.2 percent. The measure also raises the double-digit tax rate on financial institutions from 10.84 to 11.04, a similar 0.2 percent increase.



Proposition 90: Righting Property Wrongs
Submitted by Steven Greenhut on 10.10.2006

On the November 7, 2006 ballot, California voters will have a chance to vote on the Protect Our Homes Initiative, Proposition 90, which would include significant restrictions on the ability of governments to use eminent domain for economic development purposes and to pass regulations that limit property rights. Why did Prop. 90 get on the ballot, and do California property owners really need its protections?



Total Records: 3
Within Business
Browse by
Recent Publications
Business & Economics Blog Archive
Powered by eResources