Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print British Opportunity Scholarships
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
10.1.1997

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
October 1997


Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that a new British study shows that school choice works.

I've just returned from a five week stay in London as a visiting fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs, one of Margaret Thatcher's favorite think tanks. By coincidence, the most interesting news items in Britain during my trip involved Margaret Thatcher's most revolutionary education program. Sixteen years ago, Mrs. Thatcher created the Assisted Places program, Britain's version of vouchers. In total, 75,000 children from low-income families have received government financial assistance to attend private independent schools.

Recently, the London School of Economics released a study that compared a sample group of students in the Assisted Places program with a group of students who were accepted into the program but who turned down the offer and instead enrolled in a government school. Statistical analysis of students' previous test scores showed that both groups were of comparable academic ability.

At the end of the students' secondary school careers, however, an amazing thing had happened. Despite their nearly identical academic abilities, the Assisted Places students had higher levels of achievement than their government-school counterparts. On the so-called A-level subject-area exams that British students take before they enter university, the Assisted Places students scored a whole grade higher on each individual subject exam. This translated into as much as a 20 percent higher numerical score. The study concluded that these findings clearly suggest that students in the Assisted Places scheme are performing better than equivalent students in the state sector.

Despite the confirmation of the program's success, Britain's new Labour government, for purely political reasons, scrapped the Assisted Places program earlier this year. Labour's mistake, however, shouldn't stop American education reformers from learning important lessons from Margaret Thatcher's successful school choice legacy.

With a perspective, I'm Lance Izumi.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources