Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print California’s Electricity Crisis
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
1.9.2001

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
January 9, 2001


Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that government, not the market, has caused California's energy crisis.

A recent New York Times article blamed California’s energy crisis on the state's supposed “blind faith in markets.” Many politicians in Sacramento are repeating this refrain, with some calling for government takeover of the power industry. Trouble is, government, not the market, caused this crisis in the first place.

Contrary to popular myth, state government did not totally deregulate the pricing mechanism for electricity. The price which utilities could buy electricity was deregulated, but government capped the price at which utilities could sell that power to consumers. Also, until recently, government regulators prevented the utilities from signing long-term contracts to buy electricity at stable prices. Thus, when the current spot price of electricity began to soar, the utilities faced bankruptcy with skyrocketing wholesale prices, but a low government-controlled retail price. The low retail price also ensures continued high consumer demand that outstrips supply causing shortages.

Government not only messed up the pricing mechanism for electricity, it also ensured that California wouldn’t have enough in-state produced power. Since the early 1990s, not a single new power plant has been built in California. Because of complex government regulations on design, construction and siting, and the opposition of environmental groups, it takes longer to build new power plants in California than elsewhere. Thus, for example, a clean natural-gas burning plant can easily take four years or more to build.

To solve California’s power woes, government must get out of the way of a market-oriented solution to this crisis. In the short run, the retail price of electricity charged to consumers must be allowed to rise to cover a more representative part of the wholesale cost utilities pay for that electricity. Allowing only relatively minor retail price increases, as Gov. Davis and the PUC support, simply guarantees blackouts at slightly higher prices. In the long term, government obstacles to the building of more power plants must be removed so that we can increase the supply of electricity to meet demand and eventually to lower prices.

With a perspective, I’m Lance Izumi.


Lance Izumi is the Director of Center for School Reform at the California-based Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy. He can be reached via email at lizumi@pacificresearch.org.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources