Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Controversy over SAT Exam
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
12.14.1999

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
December 14, 1999


Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that SAT exam is a good predictor of student success in college.

Over this past year, there's been a loud drumbeat to de-emphasize the SAT exam, which is used by most colleges and universities to help determine admissions. The U.S. Department of Education has issued a draft guideline saying that colleges should rethink their use of the SAT if it adversely impacts minority admissions. Here in California, Gov. Gray Davis successfully pushed the UC Regents to admit pools of high-school students on grades alone. Why all this effort against the SAT, and is it justified?

One reason for the SAT backlash is that falling SAT scores embarrass many educators and politicians. After years of government-sponsored education reforms, SAT scores in California are well below what they were several decades ago. Also, the SAT scores of African-American and Latino students in California are way below the state and national averages. In response, many claim that the SAT is biased and should be eliminated.

Studies, however, show that the SAT is an effective tool in predicting students' success in college. One massive study found that the SAT is a better predictor of college success than high-school grades alone. The study also found that the SAT predicts a slightly higher college GPA for minority students than they actually earn.

Eliminating the SAT would also result in unintended consequences. A University of California study found that if the SAT were eliminated, the UC would have to raise their standard high-school GPA for admissions. Under such a scenario, the eligibility rate of African-American students would fall significantly.

What prevents many minority students from entering the UC system isn't the SAT, but their failure to complete required core courses while in high school. In 1997, approximately three-quarters of African-American and Latino high-schoolers in California had not completed these courses.

If we want to see more minority students going to top universities, we need to increase the rigor of the education they are receiving in our public schools. Eliminating the SAT would just mask the real problem.

With a perspective, I'm Lance Izumi.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources