Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Drug companies' risk-taking saves lives
Health Care Op-Ed
By: Sally C. Pipes
7.18.2006

USA Today, July 18, 2006

Letter to the Editor:

In a July 11 article, Marcia Angell claims that drug companies are "exploiting the desperation of people with a life-threatening illness" ("Prices soar for cancer drugs," News). That's utter nonsense. Avastin would not be in existence today if Genentech Inc. had not invented it.

Angell, a former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, is an outspoken advocate of socialist health care and government-imposed price controls on drugs. The irony is that if she had her way, a drug such as Avastin would have never been invented in the first place.

Today, it costs almost $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Cancer patients have hope precisely because companies are willing to risk that money in hopes of developing drugs such as Avastin, Erbitux, Gleevec, Herceptin, Nexavar, Sutent and many others.

If our government makes these drugs unprofitable, companies will simply stop trying to invent them. Researchers at the University of Connecticut's Center for Healthcare and Insurance Studies found that from 1960 to 2001, government interference in drug pricing caused $188 billion in lost spending on research and development. The "lost" medicines that might have been developed with the money could have saved about 140 million life years.

 

Sally C. Pipes
President and CEO
Pacific Research Institute
San Francisco

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources