Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Drug companies' risk-taking saves lives
Health Care Op-Ed
By: Sally C. Pipes
7.18.2006

USA Today, July 18, 2006

Letter to the Editor:

In a July 11 article, Marcia Angell claims that drug companies are "exploiting the desperation of people with a life-threatening illness" ("Prices soar for cancer drugs," News). That's utter nonsense. Avastin would not be in existence today if Genentech Inc. had not invented it.

Angell, a former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, is an outspoken advocate of socialist health care and government-imposed price controls on drugs. The irony is that if she had her way, a drug such as Avastin would have never been invented in the first place.

Today, it costs almost $1 billion to bring a new drug to market. Cancer patients have hope precisely because companies are willing to risk that money in hopes of developing drugs such as Avastin, Erbitux, Gleevec, Herceptin, Nexavar, Sutent and many others.

If our government makes these drugs unprofitable, companies will simply stop trying to invent them. Researchers at the University of Connecticut's Center for Healthcare and Insurance Studies found that from 1960 to 2001, government interference in drug pricing caused $188 billion in lost spending on research and development. The "lost" medicines that might have been developed with the money could have saved about 140 million life years.

 

Sally C. Pipes
President and CEO
Pacific Research Institute
San Francisco

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources