Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Economc Study Funded by Prop. 23 backers questioned
Sacramento Bee
10.24.2010

The report had a tantalizing hook: "Proposition 23 will create 1.3 million jobs by 2020," including 150,000 jobs next year.

Proponents of the campaign to roll back the state's landmark greenhouse gas reduction law touted the nonprofit Pacific Research Institute's study in an Oct. 5 news release as "good news for California's more than 2.2 million unemployed and good news for the state's economy."

What they didn't say is that the Yes on 23 campaign paid for that study.

Campaign filings show the Yes on 23 committee paid the Pacific Research Institute $40,000 on Sept. 2.

Ben Zycher, author of the Pacific Research Institute report, said he "wasn't paid by the oil companies to do this paper."

Zycher said his study, which was reviewed by outside experts, provides an accurate account of the impacts of California's greenhouse gas reduction law, which he characterizes as a costly energy tax.

"I have no idea who funded it, but I do know I wasn't paid $40,000," said Zycher.

"If they think I was a prostitute, let them point to an error in the paper."

Read more: http://www.sacbee.com/2010/10/24/3125692/economic-study-funded-by-prop.html

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources