Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Eliminating California's Car Tax
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
3.10.1998

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
March 10, 1998



Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that California's high car taxes could trigger another tax revolt.

Last year, Republican James Gilmore won a landslide victory in the Virginia governor's race by capitalizing on grassroots anger over the state car tax. Could a similar rebellion occur here in California?

Consider. California's high overall motor vehicle taxes rank it third among all states. Worse, the largest motor vehicle tax, the vehicle license fee or VLF, averages $185 per vehicle and goes only to non-highway expenditures. VLF funds go mostly to city and county general funds and local health and social service programs.

Recently, Assemblyman Tom McClintock introduced legislation to eliminate the VLF car tax. Under McClintock's plan, the VLF would be phased out over five years. In year one of the phase-out, the first $5,000 of a vehicle's valuation would be exempt from taxation. In the following years, the exemption would increase by $5,000 increments per year until, in the fifth year, there would be a total exemption for all vehicles.

What would elimination of the car tax do to the state budget? Not much. Because of California's economic rebound, revenues to the state General Fund are skyrocketing. According to Assemblyman McClintock, in the first year of the phase-out, a one-year spending freeze would be imposed on some non-essential state departments to offset the half-billion-dollar first-year impact of reducing the car tax. After that, modest revenue growth rates for the next four years would cover the impact of the car tax reduction and elimination. Also, McClintock's plan would not affect Prop. 98 funding for schools or proposed funding for state prisons.

To protect local governments, McClintock's bill dedicates a portion of future sales taxes to replace lost VLF revenues.

The bottom line, according to Mr. McClintock, is that abolishing the car tax "would reduce costs to California families of a practical necessity in the Golden State: the family car." My slogan suggestion for this new tax revolt: Floor it, baby!

With a perspective, I'm Lance Izumi.

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources