Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Elimination of UC Color-Blind
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
5.1.2001

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
May 1, 2001


Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that it would be unwise for the University of California to undo its color-blind admissions policy.

When he was elected California’s lieutenant governor, Cruz Bustamante had the reputation as a political moderate. Yet, for much of his tenure, Bustamante has been a leader of liberal forces that wish to re-institute race preferences in government policy. Indeed, Bustamante, who also sits on the University of California Board of Regents, will propose at the regents’ May meeting that the UC drop its 1995 ban on racial preferences in admissions.

According to Mr. Bustamante, he wants to remove the supposed “unwelcome” mat in front of the UC. Paradoxically, he believes that race preferences are needed to ensure equal opportunity.

Bustamante’s claims are flawed. First, given that the number of applications to UC from underrepresented minorities has gone up under the regents’ current policy, it is hard to see any “unwelcome” mat. Indeed, the number of blacks and Hispanics in the UC system as a whole has increased. Although Bustamante and his allies point to a dip in underrepresented minorities at UC Berkeley and UCLA, those two schools are still as or more diverse as comparable high-prestige public and private universities.

Even if the regents’ current policy was repealed, Prop. 209 would still ban any reconsideration of race in the admissions process. Bustamante, though, says that dropping the policy would also allow the UC to eliminate its associated policy of admitting 50 to 75 percent of students on grades and test scores alone. Yet, sacrificing merit to create a politically-correct racially-proportionate student body places social-engineering concerns above achievement at the very time Gov. Davis and others are emphasizing student achievement in the K-12 system.

Bustamante’s proposal is a bad idea. Instead of playing racial politics, the lieutenant governor should concentrate instead on increasing the pool of black and Hispanic students who are academically prepared for a UC-level education.

With a perspective, I’m Lance Izumi.

Lance Izumi is the Director of Center for School Reform at the California-based Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy. He can be reached via email at lizumi@pacificresearch.org.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources