Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Focus on Better Education Instead
The New York Times
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
5.21.2012

Falling back to 1970s-style desegregation policies like busing ignores new schooling options that weren’t available decades ago and which offer better educational opportunities for minority students.

Steve Rivkin, a professor of economics at Amherst College, warns that, “transporting students long distances to reduce segregation in schools is costly, time-consuming for students and likely to reduce parental participation in the schools.” Most important, regarding whether desegregation programs improved outcomes for African-Americans, he says, “there is little good evidence to bear on this question.”

Desegregation supporters then and now say that improving access to better quality education for minority children is one of their key goals. If so, then why not focus on newer education models that are producing better results for these students? Take, for example, charter schools, the autonomous deregulated public schools which first appeared in the 1990s.

A 2009 study of New York City’s charter schools by researchers from Stanford, the University of Pennsylvania and the National Bureau of Economic Research found that on average, students who attended charter schools for grades kindergarten through eighth grade could close the achievement gap among white and black students by about “86 percent in math and 66 percent in English.” The study used the most rigorous experimental design, randomized control trial, which compares students who were admitted to charters through a lottery selection process versus those who lost in the lottery and attended regular public schools.

Jay Greene, a professor of education reform at the University of Arkansas, notes that all studies of charter schools using this rigorous methodology have found that charters improve the performance of urban disadvantaged minority.

Parents from low-income minority communities continue to rally for access to charter schools and other new choice options that offer hope and better outcomes for their children. Our energies should focus on meeting their demands.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/05/20/is-segregation-back-in-us-public-schools/focus-on-better-education-instead-of-desegregation

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources