Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Growth Industry for Lobbyists: You, the Taxpayer
Bnet
3.26.2010

Bnet, March 26, 2010


State Level Lobbying and Taxpayers: How Much Do We Really Know?
Forget the stereotype of the lobbyists shilling for corporate welfare in the polished corridors of K Street. The biggest single market for the lobby industry is government itself, as state entities try to get (or keep) money and privileges flowing from legislatures.

The Pacific Research Institute (PRI) recently studied how states rank in their disclosure and accessibility laws on government-to-government lobbying. The study concluded that such “lobbying is by and large not held to the same disclosure and regulation standards as private-sector groups.” Unlike paid lobbyists for corporations, few states have strong regulations about lobbyist registration and disclosure. The study showed Connecticut required the most disclosure and New Hampshire the least.

The PRI estimates that in 2008, state and local governments spent more than $84 million lobbying the federal government. California spent almost $21 million, or 17% of all spending by lobbyists.

In the last year both Tennessee and Mississippi have had scandals related to their university systems hiring lobbyists to try and get more money out of the legislature. Both states have struggled to to make this lobbying more accountable. The concern is that the money spent to hire lobbyists is taking funding from the work of education.

One way a lobbyist may help a company, group or government is to get earmarks, which is when Congressmen and Senators write specific funding for a project or entity into a spending bill.

The Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives have moved to ban earmarks given to for-profit organizations. This still allows non-profits like universities and research organizations to receive them. One likely result of this is that there will be more government-to-government lobbying.

The question that underlies all this is whether it is good use for local and state tax dollars to be paying for lobbyists. Many states are facing spending cuts and/or rising deficits. Wouldn’t the money be better spent on education and jobs rather then on high-priced lobbyists working smoke-filled rooms and corridors?
Related Link
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources