Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print How Should California Schools Teach Climate Change?
Sacramento Union Op-Ed
By: Thomas Tanton
6.18.2008

Sacramento Union, June 18, 2008


One California lawmaker is gaining momentum with a bill that would include “climate change” among the science topics in public schools. Senate Bill 908, authored by Joe Simitian, a Palo Alto Democrat, would include climate change in science textbooks approved for California public schools.

“You can’t have a science curriculum that is relevant and current if it doesn’t deal with the science behind climate change,” Simitian said. “This is a phenomenon of global importance and our kids ought to understand the science behind that phenomenon.”

Some legislators, however, counter that the science on global warming is not clear, and others worry the bill would inject environmental propaganda into classrooms.

“I find it disturbing that this mandate to teach this theory is not accompanied by a requirement that the discussion be science-based and include a critical analysis of all sides of the subject,” said Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, during the Senate debate.

Another opponent, Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Merced, said he wants guarantees that the views of global warming skeptics will be taught.

“Some wouldn’t view them as skeptics. Some would view them as the right side of the issue,” said Denham, an almond farmer who also runs a plastics recycling business. “We don’t have complete factual information yet.”

Sen. Simitian noted that his bill would not dictate what to teach or in what grades, but rather would require the state Board of Education and state Department of Education to decide both. That comes as little consolation to those who are called skeptics, and worse, by the global warming alarmists.

Although global warming is mentioned in California classes about weather, it is currently not required to be covered in all textbooks, said the head of the California Science Teachers Association.

“This is a great idea. I don’t think there’s any reason to talk about politics,” said Christine Bertrand, the group’s executive director. “There’s no argument that there is climate change. The argument is how much is caused by the activities of mankind.”

Bertrand said teachers would have plenty to teach: Rising levels of carbon dioxide, how temperatures are measured globally, and what is known about global warming. The bill, however, is silent on the very political aspect of what should be done, if anything, and how to address any warming that, in fact, is caused by human activity.

How that should be taught in schools remains open to question. The measure does not include any requirements that teachers even be scientifically knowledgeable about the topic. Senate Bill 908 is also silent on the important correlated topic of economics.

What will climate change cost? What will be the effect of politically motivated actions on the economy of California? That is something students and legislators alike should be learning.

The state Senate approved SB 908, Jan. 30 by a 26-13 vote. It now awaits a vote in the appropriations committee in the Assembly.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources