Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Let Them Eat Laptops
National Center for Policy Analysis
11.19.2007

National Center for Policy Analysis, November 19, 2007


Early reviews of One Laptop per Child's (OLPC) finished product -- the XO, or "$100 laptop" -- extol its many innovative features.  None of these reviews, however, mention what the XO fails to provide, such as a source of clean drinking water, abundant and nutritious food, or medicines for curable diseases, says Daniel Ballon, a Fellow at the Pacific Research Institute.

Further, the project could actually hurt developing countries, says Ballon:

  • OLPC's business model actually requires substantial investment from the governments, diverting limited resources away from a population's critical needs.
  • The "$100 laptop," which actually costs $188, can only be purchased at a minimum quantity of 250,000.
  • OLPC targets countries like Nigeria, where one out of three children suffer from malnutrition; there a $50 million minimum investment could instead be used to feed more than a million children for an entire year.

Beyond exploitation, OLPC seems to feel entitled to a monopoly, shaming Intel's rival low-cost laptop.  Apparently the non-profit group fails to understand a basic market concept, says Ballon:

  • In a free market, consumers enjoy the freedom to purchase those products that best suit their needs.
  • When governments make purchasing decisions on behalf of the people, they rob the consumer of that freedom.
  • If OLPC wished to compete in the free market, they would target their product directly to the consumer.
  • By opting instead to lobby for government contracts, OLPC ensures that the XO remains immune from market forces.

If OLPC cannot wait for a laptop market to materialize or distribute the XO exclusively by donation, there are viable alternatives for realizing the project's mission, says Ballon. The use of cell phones is skyrocketing in the developing world.  By the end of next year, this market will include 50 percent of the world's population.  Mobile devices are an inexpensive, tested technology, and increasingly offer access to the Internet.

Source: Daniel Ballon, "Let Them Eat Laptops," TCS Daily, November 7, 2007.

For text:

http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=110707A

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources