Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Murphy's motives
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review News Clipping
1.19.2009

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (Pittsburgh, PA), January 18, 2009
TMCnet.com (Norwalk, CT), January 18, 2009

Sometimes we really have to wonder about the motives of those who purport to represent the greater good in Washington. Take, for instance, Congressman Tim Murphy.

Mr. Murphy, the 18th Congressional District "Republican," adamantly insists that the deceptively titled Employee Free Choice Act won't scotch the secret union organizing ballot.

Under current law, the process of unionizing begins when 30 percent of workers sign a petition. The National Labor Relations Board then oversees a secret-ballot vote by all employees. A union is recognized if more than 50 percent back it.

Under the "free choice" measure, there's no NLRB vote. If a simple majority of employees sign the petition, the union is recognized. Employers can't demand a secret ballot. But employees still can, Murphy says.

If they like to be intimidated by union goons, we suppose.

Additionally, the proposal "will fundamentally shift the balance of power in the country's labor markets to big unions and in doing so impose serious costs on American workers in the form of lower investment and less job creation," says Jason Clemens of the Pacific Research Institute.

In his zeal to be loved by organized labor, Tim Murphy is hurting the very people he insists the Employee Free Choice Act will help. That's not representation, that's opportunism in pursuit of self-serving political survival.



Related Links
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources