Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print No strings left behind
PRI in the News
2.25.2005

Orange County Register, February 25, 2005


States took federal education money, now complain Washington is stifling innovation

Federal money brings federal control. That's the reality of all federal programs -- and something demonstrated anew by President Bush's No Child Left Behind education law.

"Under NCLB, the federal government's role has become excessively intrusive in the day-to-day operations of public education,'' concluded a report on No Child Left Behind released Feb. 23 by the National Conference of State Legislatures. "This assertion of federal authority into an area historically reserved to the states has had the effect of curtailing additional state innovations and undermining many that had occurred during the past three decades.''

California in particular is being affected. The Feb. 17 Los Angeles Times reported that this year only 14 of the state's 1,000 school districts were placed on a "watch list'' of those needing improvement. "But hundreds of districts could be considered failures within two years if California yielded to Washington's demands, according to state education officials.''

Well, we've long argued for stronger state standards. And when No Child Left Behind was being debated in Congress four years ago, we warned it would come with strings attached. Congress passed it and all the states have accepted the money. The state lawmakers' protest is coming a little late.

"They're trying to close the barn door when the horses have left,'' Lance Izumi, director of education studies at the Pacific Research Institute, told us. "They should have objected to it at a much earlier date. The states already are investing lots of money in state accountability systems.''

The state legislators' report made 43 specific recommendations to make No Child Left Behind more amenable to state innovation. One of the legislators' recommendations reads, "Fully fund the act and provide states the financial flexibility to meet its goals. The federal government funds less than 8 percent of the nation's education program ... .'' If you beg for even more federal money, don't be surprised if the feds aren't going to be eager to give up their centralized control.

If state legislators really are concerned about keeping control of their own schools, they might consider refusing all federal money for education.

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources