Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Prop. 88: Good Solution For Schools? Parcel Tax Would Go To Underfunded Schools
PRI in the News
By: Lyanne Melendez
10.10.2006

ABC 7-KGO TV News, October 10, 2006

It's called a smart investment for California schools -- an estimated $500 million a year through Proposition 88. The money would come from a parcel tax. Almost all homeowners would pay $50 a year. But opponents argue it would not be a good solution to funding schools.

Teachers in California have long been dipping into their pockets to pay for classroom materials. Supporters of Proposition 88 promise more money to buy materials. The proposed state parcel tax would also go toward class size reduction and programs to make schools safer.

Roughly 10 million California homeowners would be paying $50 a year, equivalent to 14 cents a day to support it.

Ted Penabella of San Jose says that's fair.

Ted Penabella, San Jose resident: "The lesser the kids are in the room, they are more inclined to learn. So $50, I think, is not that much."

The monies would be collected and transferred to a new fund and then distributed to the school districts.

Joshua Trevino is with Pacific Research Institute, a free-market think tank group. He opposes it. He says the $500 million parcel tax represents only one percent of what California already spends on education.

Joshua Trevino, Pacific Research Institute: "It's not enough to make a huge difference, but enough to place an unfair burden on property owners in the state of California."

Melanie Osbourne, a parent, would like to see an even higher state parcel tax.

Melanie Osbourne, San Jose parent: "People are willing to do it for private, but I don't understand why they won't do it for public schools."

Ironically, many school districts don't like it because they claim Prop. 88 would take away from any future parcel taxes which typically bring in more money than Prop. 88 would.

Joshua Trevino: "And they are going to be reluctant to give to their communities in the form of property taxes or similar tax when they have already given to the state on the same account."

Still, it's a start says Jack O'Connell, superintendent of schools, who argues the needs are critical. Public education today is still underfunded.

Elderly and disabled homeowners would be exempt from the $50 parcel tax.

 

ABC website video clip

 


Copyright 2006, ABC7/KGO-TV/DT.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources