Sacramento Spendoholics! The Bigger the Surplus, the More the California Legislature Spends, Study Shows
Press Release
4.10.2001
For Immediate Release: April 10, 2001
San Francisco, CA – As tax day approaches, a new study shows that the California legislature spends over $9 in new expenditures for each dollar of surplus revenue. Send It and They Will Spend It: The Case for Tax Cuts in California by economist William L. Anderson, Ph.D., released today by the California-based Pacific Research Institute, reports that debate over budget surpluses and deficits are misguided; the real concern is insatiable and out-of-control government spending. The study comes as Californians face skyrocketing energy bills, layoffs, evaporating personal investments, and a looming recession. According to Anderson, California has some of the nation’s highest state income tax rates, and even the most modest reduction in state income tax rates would generate hundreds of thousands of new jobs and increase investment capital by billions of dollars. "Whenever the government runs large budget surpluses, legislators congratulate themselves for fiscal responsibility, but it really means that taxes are too high," said Dr. Anderson. "For the last 30 years, whenever Californians have paid more taxes, the legislature simply spent more money. Real fiscal responsibility calls for giving that money back to the taxpayers, not coming up with new ways to spend it. After all, it is ‘their’ money." Highlights of the report’s findings include When Californians pay more in taxes, the legislature increases state expenditures. Examination of the California state budget revenues and expenditures from 1968 to 1996 reveals that: Lowering tax rates a mere one-to-two percentage points would lower revenues, but would increase employment, capital stock and investment in the private economy. Using the California State Tax Analysis Modeling Project (Cal-STAMP) econometric model, the study offers two scenarios: One Percent Tax Rate Reduction: If the California legislature cut the state tax rate by one-percent across the board, in 2002, it would, in effect, leverage more than $36.8 billion in capital investment, $7.7 billion in new payroll, and 212,963 new jobs. Two Percent State Tax Reduction: The second scenario has a slightly more aggressive cut in tax rates at two percent. It would create, by 2002, almost $66 billion of new capital investment, $13.9 billion of new payroll, and 381,333 new jobs.
"If a recession is coming, as many economic analysts believe, state tax cuts would make California more capital friendly and ensure a more robust recovery for California," said Anderson. 
William L. Anderson, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Economics at North Greenville College in South Carolina. The Pacific Research Institute is a free-market public policy think tank in San Francisco, California. ###
To schedule an interview, contact Dawn Dingwell at 415/989-083, x. 136 or email mailto:dcollier@pacificresearch.org.
|