Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Schwarzenegger Signs California Cable Franchise Bill
PRI in the News
10.2.2006

Xchange Online, October 2, 2006

Service providers that want to offer cable TV services in California will now find a more welcoming regulatory climate, given new statewide franchise rules. Gov. Schwarzenegger late last week signed AB 2987, which allows telecommunications companies to receive a single permit to deliver Internet and television services to homes and businesses instead of having to apply for individual permits with cities and counties.

Other states with statewide cable TV franchises include Indiana, Kansas, New Jersey, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia.

At the same time, some telephone companies have been pushing for a nationwide franchising approval process. However, the federal bill has not gotten enough votes to make it to a vote on the floor, and it's widely expected that it won't make it before November elections.

For telcos entering the TV arena, such legislation is obviously good news. Until the various states passed such legislation, video providers had to negotiate with various municipalities to offer their services, a very arduous and time consuming process.

"It was past time for lawmakers to remove the monopoly that local governments had created for cable services," said Sonia Arrison, director of technology studies at the Pacific Research Institute and co-author of “Cutting the Cord: Streamlining the Video Franchising Process,” a major study released this year on the merits of reforming the video franchise system. “Over the last 10 years, cable television rates have shot up almost 86 percent but without any significant improvement in service. Moreover, competitors to this dysfunctional system have been clamoring to get into the market."

However, many legacy cable TV providers feel this expedited franchising process is unfair. A letter on the National Cable & Telecommunications Association Web site from NCTA President & CEO Kyle McSlarrow to members of Congress says such legislation is a "Bell monopoly" effort "to short-circuit this [video franchise] process by having you focus only on one side of the equation video and they do so by grasping for special benefits that are unparalleled for companies of a scale that dwarfs their competitors."

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources