Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Sixteen States May Ban Texting While Driving
Info Tech & Telecom News Clipping
By: Krystle Russin
8.1.2008

Info Tech & Telecom News (Heartland Institute), August 1, 2008


Citing an alleged rise in automobile accidents, 16 states--including Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, and New York--are considering legislation to ban text messaging, or "texting," while driving.

The data supporting the allegations stem mostly from a study conducted by Nationwide Insurance, which estimates the number of texting-related accidents is increasing. An estimated 20 percent of U.S. drivers send text messages while behind the wheel, and 66 percent of 18- to 24-year-olds text when driving alone, according to the study.


Unnecessary Legislation

Daniel Ballon, Ph.D., a fellow in technology at the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco, California, says texting-ban legislation is unneeded and superfluous to existing law.

"[L]awmakers should focus on keeping reckless drivers off the road, rather than designing mandates for rapidly evolving technologies," Ballon said.

"In California, it is already illegal to drive with 'willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property,'" Ballon continued. "This includes someone with a cell phone propped to his ear just as it includes someone shaving, applying makeup, or practicing his juggling routine.

"Specific technology mandates become obsolete before they are passed, and take away the ability of patrol officers to exercise common sense," Ballon said.


Local Variations

The proposed laws vary in form if not intent.

"Some laws only ban texting with teen drivers," said Jonathan Adkins, spokesman for the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA). "Only three states, Washington, New Jersey, and Minnesota, ban it altogether for all drivers."

According to GHSA, persons employed in some professions are allowed to text while driving, in states such as Connecticut and Washington, DC. Other states ban it only in a few jurisdictions, and not a single state bans both texting and talking on a cell phone. A Utah driver, for example, must be using a cell phone with another offense, such as speeding, for it to count as a violation.

"I think it's ridiculous," said Illinois resident Jason Holford, who admits he cancelled his own cell phone plan because it was too distracting from daily life. "Texting, talking. Why should someone be on the phone while driving at all? We don't actually know how many accidents were caused by cell phone usage because we don't know what was happening at the time of every car crash. It has to be higher than we think."


Krystle Russin (krystle@purepolitics.com) writes from Texas.

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources