Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print The Republican Election Setbacks
KQED Commentary
By: Lance T. Izumi, J.D.
11.17.1998

KQED logo

by Lance T. Izumi, Fellow in California Studies
Pacific Research Institute
November 17, 1998


Announcer lead: Time for Perspectives. Lance Izumi says that social conservatives aren't to blame for Republican election setbacks.

For the past couple weeks, moderates in the Republican party have had a field day blaming the social conservative wing of the GOP for the party's setbacks in this year's elections. According to the moderates' spin, Republicans fared worse than expected because the party's candidates failed to emphasize economic issues, especially the importance of tax cuts.

Although it's true that Republicans, for the most part, failed to focus on pocketbook issues such as taxes, this failure was certainly not the fault of social conservatives in the party. Take, for example, this year's federal budget agreement. One of the glaring flaws in the budget deal was the absence of any significant tax cut. Despite a potential trillion-dollar budget surplus over the next five years, Republicans in the U.S. Senate couldn't even agree to pass a paltry five-year $80 billion tax cut. Instead, congressional Republicans agreed to President Clinton's big-spending status quo budget.

Who was responsible for Republicans taking a dive on tax cuts in the budget deal? The reality is that it was moderates in the party's economic wing, led by Senate Budget Committee chairman Pete Domenici, who actually fought against big tax cuts. In contrast, one of the few heroes in the tax cut battle was Missouri Republican Sen. John Ashcroft, one of the Senate's leading social conservatives. Sen. Ashcroft tried unsuccessfully to get a large tax cut included in the Senate's budget proposal. Indeed, before Labor Day Sen. Ashcroft issued a bold, innovative and comprehensive tax cut plan that would flatten tax rates, eliminate certain taxes, and reduce the tax burden on taxpayers by $1.7 trillion over five years.

Finally, it should be noted that social conservative organizations pushed very hard for tax cuts. Groups such as the Christian Coalition and the Family Research Council were part of a broad coalition that in September called on Congress to pass a tax cut.

There is no question that Republicans shot themselves in the foot by not having a coherent policy agenda. It wasn't social conservatives, however, who pulled the trigger.

With a perspective, I'm Lance Izumi.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources