Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Think tank raps ‘net neutrality'
PRI in the News
9.4.2007

NewsOK.com (OK), Sept. 4, 2007
The issue of "net neutrality” is heating up again with a California think tank weighing in on the issue.

Net neutrality, as it is known, ensures that all users of the Internet are treated equally without owners of infrastructure charging some users fees for higher volumes.

The Pacific Research Institute alleges in a report issued this week that imposing a regulatory regime of "net neutrality” would harm consumers, quash innovation and investment, and prove difficult or impossible to change in the future.

The findings were released in a report entitled Net Gains or Net Losses? The Net Neutrality Debate and the Future of the Internet.

"At its heart, the net neutrality debate is about price controls, and net-neutrality advocates want government regulation — rather than the open market — to determine what we pay for using the Internet," said K. Lloyd Billingsley, editorial director at PRI and author of Net Gains or Net Losses?

Net neutrality advocates believe it should be illegal for broadband service providers to charge their customers more for higher levels of service.

Those who oppose net neutrality maintain that service providers should be allowed to set pricing policies that are flexible enough to meet a variety of consumer needs.

Related Link
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources