Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print What Now?
National Review
3.21.2010

National Review Symposium (p6), March 21, 2010


With the Democrats’ health-care legislation having cleared the last legislative hurdle, it is all but inevitable that President Obama will be signing it into law. Is this the end of the road for the debate, or is there a way forward for real reform that puts decisions into the hands of health-care consumers rather than the government? National Review’s panel of health-care watchers weighs in.



It goes to show the lengths to which Pelosi, President Obama, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are prepared to go to take over 17.3 percent of the American economy.

The CBO estimates that the reconciliation bill will cost $938 billion over ten years while reducing the deficit by $124 billion over the same period. If enacted, the plan will likely cost in excess of $2 trillion and result in higher taxes, increased deficits, and rationed care for all Americans. This debate is not about achieving universal coverage at a lower cost; that will not be done under Obamacare. This debate is about an ideological insistence on having the government make decisions about our health care rather than letting individuals make them. Their goal is a single-payer, government-run system called “Medicare for All.”

The Republicans do have ideas about how to make health care affordable, accessible, and of a higher quality. The party must find a strong leader with a clear vision of how to reform our health-care system based on patient-centered solutions. In the 2010 elections, they must make large gains in the House and the Senate. In 2012, a Republican president must be elected so that the repeal process can be consummated.

There is precedent: In 1989, Medicare Catastrophic was repealed, and this can be, too, though no one should pretend that it will be easy. In fact, the repeal of this titanic new initiative will be enormously difficult. We are driving headlong down the road to serfdom, and no advanced democracy that has come down this far has ever found an off ramp.


— Sally C. Pipes is president and ceo of the Pacific Research Institute. She is author of The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care.

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources