Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Affirmative Action in California's State Civil Service: Who is Really Underrepresented and Why

By: Michael Lynch
10.1.1996

Affirmative Action in California's State Civil Service: Who is Really Underrepresented and Why


The California state civil service has pursued policies of "affirmative action" for more than 25 years. In 1971, then Governor Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order (E.O.) No. R-34-71, which stated "justice demands that every citizen consciously adopt and accentuate a personal commitment to affirmative action which will make equal opportunity a reality." The legislature built on Reagan's E.O. in 1977, giving the State Personnel Board (SPB) responsibility for coordinating the state's affirmative action efforts and for assisting departments in setting hiring goals and timetables. In the 1980s, both Governors Jerry Brown and George Deukmejian issued executive orders reaffirming the state's commitment to affirmative action. Following suit, Governor Pete Wilson issued E.O. W-125-95 on June 1, 1995. Wilson, who had become the state's leading critic of affirmative action programs that granted preferences based on race and gender, prohibited state agencies and departments from granting preferences in their hiring processes and mandated that they use Relevant Labor Force (RLF) data (the ethnic composition of those qualified to do the job in the area in which an agency would be expected to recruit), rather than General Labor Force (GLF) data (the ethnic composition of the private sector workforce based on the latest U.S. Census) to set goals and timetables.

 

Read PDF
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources