Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Healthy California Series: Deadly Solution: SB-840 and the Government Takeover of California Health Care
PRI Study
By: John R. Graham
6.12.2006

Last year, State Senator Sheila Kuehl (D-Los Angeles) introduced SB-840, the California Health
Insurance Reliability Act, which the State Senate has passed and now awaits debate in the Assembly,
having passed the Assembly Health Committee in summer 2005. SB-840 imposes a Canadian-style
government healthcare monopoly in California.

This briefing paper demonstrates the negative consequences of such a system, and advances consumer-directed health care as an alternative. SB-840 is supported analytically by a report from the Lewin Group, a consulting firm in Virginia. The Lewin Group’s report claims that SB-840 will result in monetary savings, but avoids other
costs that government monopoly imposes on health care. Remarkably, less than five years ago, the same Lewin Group wrote a critical analysis of single payer health care in Canada that warns Americans against adopting such a system, because “the cost savings could be associated with a decline in quality of care and an upsurge in negative public opinion.”

 

Read PDF Briefing
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources