Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Questions for Jack O'Connell
PRI in the News
5.10.2007

San Diego Union-Tribune, May 10, 2007


Ever wondered what happened to the state Department of Education whistleblowers who were punished by Education Secretary Delaine Eastin in the late 1990s for exposing millions of dollars in fraudulent grants to adult education programs, often bogus citizenship classes for new immigrants?

 

One of them, James Lindberg, just got a second big judgment in his favor -- $7.6 million -- according to K. Lloyd Billingsley of the Pacific Research Institute. In a column about the latest court rebuke to the Department of Education, Billingsley makes good points about its present leader:

 

Current ed boss Jack O'Connell made no move to stop the continued appeal after [a jury first gave the whistleblower $4.5 million in] 2002 and has been rather silent about this case. Legislators and taxpayers have a right to know how much money the department spent on attorneys in a losing cause. That money will not be used in any classroom for the benefit of students. Legislators may want to hold hearings, which could pursue other key questions.

 

How many people, if any, were disciplined or dismissed for taking hostile action against CDE employees for the faithful performance of their duties in exposing fraud and corruption? How is it that those responsible for punishing whistleblowers so easily find other lucrative employment in the education system? Since the courts have again confirmed wrongdoing by the CDE, when will the department publicly own up to it? Does similar misappropriation of funds still continue in the adult education system?

 

Good questions all. Will O'Connell answer them? I doubt it.

 

 

Posted by Chris Reed at May 10, 2007 05:22 PM | Send a comment

 

Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources