As Pacific Research Institute’s Lance T. Izumi notes:
“Market-based competition is the best incentive to force public schools to improve, and school-choice voucher programs have shown that they can effectively provide this competitive incentive. If 2008 is to be the year of education reform, vouchers need to be a key part of the reform agenda.”
Izumi quotes from Former U.S. secretary of education Rod Paige:
“Under the current monopolistic system, public schools have no incentive to embark on substantial reforms or make major improvements because no matter how badly they perform: their budgets won’t be cut; their enrollment won’t decline; [and] the school won’t close down.”
“Indeed,” says Izumi, “under California’s accountability system, none of these consequences have ever befallen poor-performing public schools. Perhaps the best incentive for improvement is a school-choice program that gives parents a voucher to choose a private-school option for their children.”
Izumi’s got more to say. He’s got examples of what works. Read it here.
This entry was posted on Friday, August 31st, 2007 at 2:03 pm and is filed under Education, Policy, National, Libertarianism, Conservatism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.









