Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Students as customers. What a concept.
PRI in the News
By: Mark Landsbaum
8.31.2007

Orange County Register, August 31st, 2007


In the face of obvious facts, public school officials seem puzzled about how to improve what they do. Perhaps if they didn’t stand to gain by perpetuating the tax-subsidized, poorly performing, family rights usurping current system, they might recognize the obvious.

As Pacific Research Institute’s Lance T. Izumi notes:

“Market-based competition is the best incentive to force public schools to improve, and school-choice voucher programs have shown that they can effectively provide this competitive incentive. If 2008 is to be the year of education reform, vouchers need to be a key part of the reform agenda.”

Izumi quotes from  Former U.S. secretary of education Rod Paige:

“Under the current monopolistic system, public schools have no incentive to embark on substantial reforms or make major improvements because no matter how badly they perform: their budgets won’t be cut; their enrollment won’t decline; [and] the school won’t close down.”

“Indeed,” says Izumi, “under California’s accountability system, none of these consequences have ever befallen poor-performing public schools. Perhaps the best incentive for improvement is a school-choice program that gives parents a voucher to choose a private-school option for their children.”

Izumi’s got more to say. He’s got examples of what works. Read it here.


This entry was posted on Friday, August 31st, 2007 at 2:03 pm and is filed under Education, Policy, National, Libertarianism, Conservatism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources