Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Modest Gains Show Need for Deeper Reforms in California Education

By: K. Lloyd Billingsley
8.24.2005

Capital IdeasCapital Ideas

SACRAMENTO, CA - Last week the state Department of Education released student test scores from spring 2005. The result is a mixed bag that holds lessons for policymakers.

There are more than 4.8 million test takers in California and five levels of proficiency: far below basic, below basic, basic, proficient, and advanced. Across the state, the ranks of the proficient in English now include 40 percent of students, still 10 points short of half but a gain of five points from last year. In math, another key subject, students registered a gain of four points to 38 percent. That is 12 percent less than half, hardly an
acceptable benchmark.

As the Los Angeles Times reported, 54 percent of third-grade students reached the proficiency level last spring, a jump of 16 percent. In English, scores of ninth-grade students jumped 15 percent to 43 percent. But problems remain.

Improvements decrease as students move to the next grade. Scores remain low for students with special needs. And the gap in achievement between racial and ethnic groups persists. The test results reveal that 65 percent of Asian students and 51 percent of white students were proficient in math. Compare that to only 27 percent of Latinos and 23 percent of African Americans.

The federal No Child Left Behind Act requires that all students test proficient by 2013-14. With 60 percent still not proficient in English, that will be a difficult task. Policymakers need to learn a few lessons from recent reforms.

The modest gains of 2005 can be attributed not to education spending but California's academic content standards, among the toughest in the nation. These should be maintained, or even made more challenging. High standards and high expectations make for high achievement. Also, every classroom should be using textbooks aligned with the content standards.

"Social promotion," the practice of advancing students to the next grade when they have not yet mastered the material, will have to be dumped. Educators should retain the high-school exit exam and reject political correctness.

Teachers are a key factor in a child's education and California makes teachers "permanent" after only two years, a practice shared by only eight other states. Most require three years. Voters will want to take a hard look at Proposition 74, on the November 8 ballot, which extends the period to five years and allows boards to fire teachers with two consecutive years of poor performance. The flexibility to hire and fire teachers is a key factor in the performance of successful charter schools.

Many regular public schools attended by Latino and African-American students are indeed substandard and surely a factor in the achievement gap. This strengthens the case for expanding educational choice. Parents should be able to pull their children out of those schools and send them elsewhere. A good place to begin would be a pilot program for students in low-achieving schools. The goal should be full choice in education
for all, as a matter of basic civil rights.

The modest gains, meanwhile, show a welcome trend toward improvement. If state officials want the gains to continue, they should maintain high standards, toughen accountability across the board, and expand parental choice.



K. Lloyd Billingsley is editorial director at the PacificResearch Institute. He can be reached via email at
klbillingsley@pacificresearch.org.


Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources