Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
WSJ's Stephen Moore Book Signing Luncheon-Rescheduled for December 17
12.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Who's the Fairest of Them All?: The Truth About Opportunity, ... 
More

Recent Events
Victor Davis Hanson Orange County Luncheon December 5, 2012
12.5.2012 12:00:00 PM

Post Election: A Roadmap for America's Future

 More

Post Election Analysis with George F. Will & Special Award Presentation to Sal Khan of the Khan Academy
11.9.2012 6:00:00 PM

Pacific Research Institute Annual Gala Dinner

 More

Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts
10.19.2012 5:00:00 PM
Author Book Signing and Reception with U.S. Supreme Court Justice ... More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Net Gains or Net Losses? The Net Neutrality Debate and the Future of the Internet
PRI Study
By: K. Lloyd Billingsley
8.29.2007

Net neutrality is the latest slogan in the battle over the “digital divide,” the notion that high technology in general, and the Internet in particular, automatically created a vast new division of haves and have-nots, which will persist unless politicians pass new laws and impose new regulations.

In the digital-divide vision, the market is inadequate to bridge the gap, ever widening with each innovation. Indeed, in this view the market is the very cause of the divide and its inequities. At the beginning of this decade, national spokesmen such as the Rev. Jesse Jackson adopted the digital divide as the civil-rights issue of our time. Jackson called it “classic apartheid,” while Kweisi Mfume of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) called it “technological segregation.” President Bill Clinton urged a “national crusade” against it.

The slogan, and some of the same rhetoric, duly arose in testimony on net neutrality before the FCC in 2007. Material submitted by the American Library Association charged that allowing ISPs or broadband providers to discriminate against certain traffic would “exacerbate the digital divide and reduce consumer choice.”

Interestingly, though, not all those who adduce the digital divide advocate net neutrality. The NAACP urged the FCC to remove barriers to broadband deployment in underserved areas—“Only then can the technological segregation formerly known as the Digital Divide be narrowed.” However, the NAACP did not specifically call for net neutrality as a way to boost broadband deployment. Neither did Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow/ PUSH (People United to Save Humanity) Coalition. In a statement to the FCC, Rainbow/PUSH called on broadband providers to continue “to invest in the development of the next-generation of the Internet for as many residents of our cities and towns as possible.” The Coalition “recognizes the need for broadband to enter all communities so everyone has the equitable opportunity to succeed in today’s digital economy.” Since the Internet is so entrenched, “we must do whatever is in our power to sustain its usage and deployment.” But the Coalition makes no specific demand for net neutrality.

 

Read PDF Study

Related Links
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources