Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Publications Archive
E-mail Print Republican HillaryCare: The Medicare Drug Benefit’s Prescription for Perverse Incentives
Health Policy Prescriptions
By: John R. Graham
2.1.2006

The complexity and confusion of the Medicare Part D drug benefit, where the media focuses its attention, is actually a relatively insignificant part of the problem posed by the new entitlement, which accelerates a vicious circle of bad incentives for politicians, citizens, and providers.

The Medicare drug benefit will make the U.S. government the payer for over one quarter of the country’s prescription drug supply. This makes the so-called “non-interference” clause, which prevents the government from interfering with price negotiations between drug makers and insurers, an extremely fragile protection from price controls. The political will to preserve it will diminish rapidly. As the pharmaceutical industry devolves into a regulated utility, the invention of new medicines will decline dramatically.

Americans are receiving mixed signals from the government: on the one hand, it gives us control of more of our health dollars while we are working and privately insured (through tools like Health Savings Accounts); but on the other hand it tells us that we are “entitled,” out of the blue, to prescription drugs and other health goods and services almost for free when we retire and go on Medicare. This creates negative incentives for privately insured patients under 65 years old, increasing the likelihood that Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) will become simply retirement savings accounts for well off Americans.

Insurers do not have good incentives to spend the appropriate amount of money on prescription drugs. Instead, Medicare establishes a “silo” approach that forces insurers to consider only one area of health spending, to patients’ detriment.

Drug makers are losing the incentive to offer their own discount programs to low-income seniors, now that the government has taken them over.

The “bidding” element of the drug benefit is its sole positive attribute, and it should be extended throughout Medicare as an interim reform. However, executing this will require extraordinary political will, which is extremely unlikely in the current climate of public opinion.

 

Read PDF
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Publications
Browse by
Recent Publications
Publications Archive
Powered by eResources