Donate
Email Password
Not a member? Sign Up   Forgot password?
Business and Economics Education Environment Health Care California
Home
About PRI
My PRI
Contact
Search
Policy Research Areas
Events
Publications
Press Room
PRI Blog
Jobs Internships
Scholars
Staff
Book Store
Policy Cast
Upcoming Events
Should City Hall Go Bankrupt?
5.30.2012 12:00:00 PM
A CalWatchdog Series on Municipal Bankruptcy 
More

Capitol Update with U.S. Rep Darrell Issa (CA-49)
6.14.2012 12:00:00 PM
Chairman, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
More

Jonah Goldberg Luncheon and Book Signing
6.22.2012 12:00:00 PM

The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of IdeasMore

Recent Events
Benjamin Rush Society Debate: UCSD
5.17.2012 3:00:00 PM
UCSD Benjamin Rush Society More

Public Pension Tsunami: Closer to the Shore?
5.17.2012 12:00:00 PM
Public Pension Panel More

Benjamin Rush Society Debate: Harvard Medical School, May 3, 2012
5.3.2012 5:45:00 PM

Harvard Bejamin Rush Society Debate

 More

Opinion Journal Federation
Town Hall silver partner
Lawsuit abuse victims project
Press Archive
E-mail Print Massachusetts Businesses Joining Health Care Coalition to Deal With Costs of Connector
Olympia Business Watch (WA) News Clipping
By: Don C. Brunell
8.13.2008

Olympia Business Watch, August 13, 2008


Washington lawmakers need to take a real close look at what is happening in Massachusetts on health care. With the cost over runs for the "Connector", Massachusetts businesses are joining a national coalition to slow premium growth and ease the financial burden on employers. In Maine, citizens fed up with the cost overruns from the state's Dirigo Care gathered enough signatures to repeal the new taxes to prop up the state system.

There is a warning for Washington from this new coalition. Employers were overwhelmed in Massachusetts by Romney Care--the nickname for the new state-run "Connector" program. While health care experts praise the new coalition, some feel it may be too late to change course, claims John R. Graham, director of health care at the Pacific Research Insitute. The government foot-hold is implanted. Devon Herrick, a senior fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis, agreed, saying Massachusetts's current government-based plan is "destined to fail, because it has no cost control whatsoever."

Spending more on health care isn't the answer either. "Many U.S. residents wrongly equate higher spending with better care," said Charles Baker, CEO of Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Massachusetts's second-largest health insurer. "The notion that the more you spend the better you are in health care is a giant urban myth."

"The answer is allowing consumers to choose a consumer-driven plan that meets their needs is better than forcing people into expensive plans with low cost-sharing, which the Commonwealth Connector Board favors, said Herrick, referring to the organization responsible for overseeing Massachusetts's government-based health insurance program.

Consumers and markets are responsible for meaningful and lasting change, not mandates and bigger government programs.


Don C. Brunell, President (DonB@awb.org)

 

Related Link
Submit to: 
Submit to: Digg Submit to: Del.icio.us Submit to: Facebook Submit to: StumbleUpon Submit to: Newsvine Submit to: Reddit
Within Press
Browse by
Recent Publications
Press Archive
Powered by eResources